USPTO serial 85953003
LOWRIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REAMS, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOWRIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Burritos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |