USPTO serial 85954225
CSCRIPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CSCRIPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan A. Raynes
EVAN A. RAYNES SYMBUS LAW GROUP, LLC1425 K ST NW STE 350WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3514UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for processing prescriptions; Providing a website featuring online non-downloadable software which enables users to process prescriptions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CERTIFY GLOBAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Certify Global LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Certify Global LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CSCRIPTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |