Drawing for CINCO MAGNOLIAS

USPTO serial 85954822

CINCO MAGNOLIAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CINCO MAGNOLIAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Stern

Steven Stern STERN & SCHURIN LLP595 Stewart Avenue, Suite 710Garden City, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 7, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 5, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2014APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 29, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 29, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2014TPADTEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jul 17, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance