Drawing for CANOPY OPEN SOURCE INTEGRATION FOR THE ENTERPRISE

USPTO serial 85955689

CANOPY OPEN SOURCE INTEGRATION FOR THE ENTERPRISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANOPY OPEN SOURCE INTEGRATION FOR THE ENTERPRISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ester Martín Maillaro

ESTER MARTÍN MAILLARO HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used to integrate multiple open-source software programsACTIVE—
042Software consulting and advisory services, namely providing information and advice in the field of open-source software design, implementation and integrationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 23, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 22, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance