USPTO serial 85956154
FOREVER CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOREVER CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Fields
PAUL FIELDS LEASON ELLIS LLP1 BARKER AVE 5TH FLWHITE PLAINS, NY 10603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; prepared salads, namely, cole slaw, potato salads, fruit salads, garden salads, Caesar salads, edamame bean salads, Niçoise style salads, mixed beans salads, chick peas salads, bean and vegetable salads; processed fruit; meat, namely, cold cuts, ribs, chicken nuggets, meat jellies, prepared and prepackaged meals and entrees consisting primarily of egg with one or more of meat, fish, poultry, vegetable, cheese or onion; baked beans; meat-based spreads, chicken-based spreads, fish-based spreads, seafood-based spreads, fruit-based spreads, vegetable-based spreads, sandwich spreads, namely, meat-based spreads, chicken spreads, cheese spreads; tofu; jams; frozen appetizers consisting primarily of chicken or seafood; bean dip, dairy-based dips; broths; soups; chicken cream soups, whipping cream; fruit compotes; fruit-based snack foods, soup bases, namely, mixes for making soup and soup pastes; soup mixes; nut-based snack mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | prepared salads, namely, pasta salads, orzo salads, acini di pepe salads, couscous salads, mixed grain salads; BBQ sauce; hot chicken sauce, poutine sauce, white sauce, brown sauce, spaghetti sauce, mushroom sauce, onion sauce, meat sauce, cheese sauce, tomato sauce, brochette sauce, ribs sauce, turkey gravy, three-pepper sauce, green peppercorn sauce, fish sauce, gravy sauce and herb sauce, red wine sauce, sauce for pork, meat sauce, chocolate sauce, fruit sauce, tartar sauce; mayonnaise; salad dressings; spices; seasonings; fruit coulis; meat pies; chicken pies, turkey pies; fish and seafood pies; quiche; frozen appetizer consisting primarily of cornmeal; tapioca; custard; pancakes; bakery desserts, namely, pudding; pies, pastries, cakes, frozen desserts, namely, frozen yoghurt, fruit bars, ice cream bars, sorbet cups; dessert mousses, chocolate confections, chocolate; pie crusts; grain-based snack foods; granola-based snack foods; dessert mixes, namely, cake mixes; pancake mixes, French toast mixes; sauce mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing of food products for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |