USPTO serial 85956881
G.B. CRANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G.B. CRANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel A. Reidy
DANIEL A REIDY LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL REIDY1230 SPRING STSTE BST HELENA, CA 94574-2070Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines derived from grapes grown on Applicant's St. Helena vineyard property located at 357 Main Street, St. Helena 94574 in the Napa Valley American Viticultural Area and labeled and advertised in compliance with United States Laws for the Napa Valley American Viticultural Area appellation of origin | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |