USPTO serial 85957235
THE MOST INTERESTING SAN ARCHITECT IN THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE MOST INTERESTING SAN ARCHITECT IN THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Zall
MICHAEL E. ZALL MICHAEL E. ZALL LAW FIRM2 YORKSHIRE DRSUFFERN, NY 10901-7414UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance of computer hardware, namely, servers; maintenance of telecommunications equipment, namely, switches for use in storage area networks, network routers, network switches, multi-protocol gateway and extension platform for storage area networks, ethernet transceivers, fiber optic light and image conduits; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of the repair of computer hardware and switches for use in storage area networks, network routers, network switches, multi-protocol gateway and extension platform for storage area networks, ethernet transceivers, fiber optic light and image conduits; installation and maintenance of enterprise telecommunications network hardware for others | ABANDONED | Jun 10, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |