Drawing for BRAID

USPTO serial 85957283

BRAID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLACZ, KATHLEEN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony M. Keats

ANTHONY M. KEATS Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP1453 3rd Street Promenade, Suite 300Santa Monica, CA 90401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear; sunglasses, eyeglass frames and cases for eyewear; decorative and protective covers and cases for portable electronic devices, namely, personal electronic devices in the nature of cell phones, mobile phones, telephones, computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, notebook computers, MP3 players, portable music players, personal digital assistants, electronic reading devices, digital cameras, and camerasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 6, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance