Drawing for BEST TASTING COD LIVER OIL

USPTO serial 85959128

BEST TASTING COD LIVER OIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST TASTING COD LIVER OIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Flynt

RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NWSTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005COD LIVER OILACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 24, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 19, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 19, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance