Drawing for EXACTBEAM

USPTO serial 85959575

EXACTBEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXACTBEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil K. Nydegger

NEIL K. NYDEGGER NYDEGGER & ASSOCIATES348 OLIVE STSAN DIEGO, CA 92103-6216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Components for use in generating, directing, and controlling radiation beams to sterilize medical supplies and medical devices and for pathogen reduction and disinfestation of foodstuffs, namely, products that are consistent with E-beam, X-ray, and RF (Radio Frequency) technologies, with said products being in the nature of radiation detectors, radiation shields for electronic products, remote sensors for use in measuring thermal and infrared radiation energy waves, X-ray apparatus not for medical purposes, RF tuning devices in the nature of resonatorsACTIVEMar 15, 2013
010Systems comprising subcomponents for sterilizing medical supplies and medical devices, namely, sterilization units for medical instruments, with said units incorporating combinations of linear accelerators, modulators, microwave tubes in the nature of klystrons, control consoles, material handling, and conveyor subsystemsACTIVEMar 15, 2013
011Systems comprising subcomponents for pathogen reduction and disinfestation of foodstuffs and for sterilizing products not including medical supplies and not including medical devices, namely, sterilizers not for medical purposes, with said sterilizers incorporating combinations of linear accelerators, modulators, microwave tubes in the nature of klystrons, control consoles, material handling and conveyor subsystemsACTIVEMar 15, 2013
040Troubleshooting, performance review, preventative maintenance, spare part review and fault log review support for sterilization services in the field of medical supplies, medical devices, and food products, namely, sterilization and disinfestation of medical supplies, medical devices, and food products that are susceptible to radiation treatment by E-beam, X-ray, and RF (Radio Frequency) technologies; Radiation services consistent with E-beam, X-ray, and RF (Radio Frequency) technologies, namely, sterilization services in the field of medial supplies and medical devices, and in the field of pathogen reduction and disinfestation of foodstuffsACTIVEMar 15, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 17, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 16, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2013MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance