USPTO serial 85961086
CUTNAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2017
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CUTNAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
Marsfield, AU
Other trademarks owned by Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
Marsfield, AU
Other trademarks owned by Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
Marsfield, AU
Other trademarks owned by Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony Santangelo, Esq.
Anthony Santangelo, Esq. The Law Offices of Anthony Santangelo, Esq., MBA385 Kings Hwy NCherry Hill, NJ 08034-1013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Machines for producing machine tools; Machine tools for woodworking machines; Machine tools for removing or shaping metal, wood, plastics, fiber, resins, polymers; Tool cutting machines; Tool grinding machines; Automatic machine tools for wood panel machining, sheet metal punching, drilling, cutting ; Precision machine tools, namely, grinding, drilling; Computerized machine tools, namely, milling, turning, punching, drilling, boring, plasma cutting; Metalworking machine tools; Agricultural machine tools, namely, grass cutters, harvesters, plows; Power tools, namely, drills, circular saws, engraving; Pneumatic power tools, namely, circular saws, spindle grinders, drills, boring, punching, circular blade slitter, shearing; Power operated hand tools, namely, drills, circular saws, routers, reciprocating saws, spindle grinders, drills, boring, circular blade slitter; Power driven hand tools, namely, boring, punching, broaching, milling, concrete cutting; Power operated drilling tools ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 2013 |
| 009 | Electric control devices for machine tools; Digital controls for machine tools; Computer based control apparatus for machine tools; Microprocessor-based control systems for use with machine tools; Machine tool control apparatus | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Interactive Machine Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CUTNAV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2024 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |