USPTO serial 85961092
LEE ZHONG KEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEE ZHONG KEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Seasonings; Sauce, namely, hot sauce, lobster sauce, garlic sauce, barbecue sauces; Condiments, namely, ketchup, mustard, chili oil for use as a seasoning or condiment; Spice, namely, cinnamon powder, curry powder, clove powder, garlic powder; Flavoring sauce namely, béchamel, soya sauces, vinegar; Sugar, namely, white sugar, brown sugar, sugar candy, cubic sugar; Vanilla flavoring; Essences for foodstuffs, except etheric essences and essential oils, namely, food flavorings; Star aniseed for use as a flavoring in food and drinks; Aniseed for use as a flavoring in food and drinks; Cereal preparations, namely, breakfast cereals, cereal bars, cornflakes, muesli, and muesli bars, processed wheat, processed oat; Processed garlic for use as seasoning; Edible oil; Ginger; Relish; Fruit sauce excluding cranberry sauce and apple sauce; Preparations made from cereals, namely, bean meal; Corn flour; Corn flour for food; Rice flour; Rice starch flour; Soya flour; Wheat starch flour; Wheat flour; Flour for food; Noodles; Rice vermicelli; Groats for human food in the nature of processed grains; Processed semolina; Flour-milling products, namely, potato flour; Allspice; Turmeric for food; Starch for food; Tapioca flour for food; Potato flour for food; Coffee flavorings; Coffee based beverages; Tea; Tea leaves; Tea based beverages | ABANDONED | Mar 3, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |