USPTO serial 85961446
AGELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S. LONDA NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotioms; dentifrices; after-shave lotions; air fragrancing preparations; aloe vera preparations for cosmetic purposes; aromatics (essential oils); balms other than for medical purposes; bath salt, not for medical purposes; cleaning preparations; cosmetics for animals; cosmetics; skin whitening creams/cream for whitening the skin; cosmetic creams; deodorants for human beings or for animals; dry shampoos; cosmetic dyes; Eau de Cologne; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; bases for flower perfumes; soap for foot perspiration; fumigation preparations (perfumes); greases for cosmetic purposes; hair dyes/haircolorants; hair spray; cosmetic kits; lip glosses; lipsticks; lotions for cosmetic purposes; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; make-up preparations; make-up removing preparations; make-up; mascara; beauty masks; medicated soap; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; nail care preparations; oils for cosmetic purposes; oils for cleaning purposes; oil for perfumes and scents; oil for toilet purposes; cosmetic pencils; eyebrow pencils; shampoos for pets; polish creams; make-up powder; sandcloth/abrasive cloth; shampoos; shaving soap; shaving preparations; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; soap; disinfectant soap; deodorant soap; sun-tanning preparations (cosmetics); sunscreen preparations; swabs (toiletries)/cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; talcum powder for toilet use; toilet water; toiletries; nail varnish/nail polish; varnish-removing preparations; whiting; windscreen cleaning liquids/windshield cleaning liquids; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; antiperspirants (toiletries); baths (cosmetic preparations for -); bleaching preparations (decolorants) for cosmetic purposes; deodorants for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |