USPTO serial 85961455
CHELLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHELLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron D. Hendelman
AARON D. HENDELMAN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for instant messaging; computer software for email delivery and organization in the field of project management; computer software for organizing and managing content and information, namely, task and project-related text, audio, visual and multimedia content and data; computer software for time management, task management, schedule planning, workload management, project management, collaboration and content sharing; computer software for sending and receiving electronic messages, and facilitating communications between two or multiple users via computer networks, communication networks and the global information network; all for general business use and project management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for instant messaging; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for email delivery and organization in the field of project management; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for organizing and managing content and information, namely, task and project-related text, audio, visual and multimedia content and data; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for time management, task management, schedule planning, workload management, project management, collaboration and content sharing; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for sending and receiving electronic messages, and facilitating communications between two or multiple users via computer networks, communication networks and the global information network; all for general business use and project management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |