Drawing for CRAVING CRUSHER

USPTO serial 85961605

CRAVING CRUSHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CRAVING CRUSHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Szuhaj

TIMOTHY J. SZUHAJ BECKER MEISEL LLC220 LAKE DR E STE 102CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002-1165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029BASES FOR MAKING MILK SHAKES; BEVERAGES HAVING A MILK BASE; DAIRY-BASED BEVERAGES; DAIRY-BASED POWDERS FOR MAKING DAIRY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES AND SHAKES; MILK-BASED BEVERAGES CONTAINING MILK CONCENTRATES, VEGETABLE OIL AND ADDED NUTRIENTS; MILK-BASED ENERGY DRINKS; SHAKES; SOY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGE USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance