USPTO serial 85961834
ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tara Reedy Sliva
TARA REEDY SLIVA DENTONS US LLPP O BOX #061080WACKER DRIVE STATION WILLIS TOWERCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical descalers for industrial purposes; rust inhibitors for construction and agriculture equipment, namely, chemical preparations in the nature of degreasers; chemical additives for fuel; anti-freeze; diesel exhaust fluid; adhesives for rock crusher bin liners, joints, fasteners, engine hoses and chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Filters | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Tires and seat cushions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rocky Mountain Dealerships Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| May 19, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |