Drawing for OPTO BEE

USPTO serial 85962518

OPTO BEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTO BEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Burns

DAVID R. BURNS MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP265 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-3113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Rating retail and consumer goods and services; business and market research, surveys and reports; conducting on-line surveys to compile data about businesses and consumers, and preparing and providing related reports; collecting, compiling and disseminating online reviews on retail and consumer goods and services via the global computer network; conclusion of commercial transactions for others, particularly via telecommunication systems; consumer market research information services; business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, production, personnel and retail sale matters; provision of television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise; advice and information about customer services and product management on Internet sites in connection with purchases made over the InternetACTIVE—
036Credit card and debit card services; gift card transaction processing services; processing credit card, debit card and charge card transactions for others; computerized financial services for retail businesses, namely, transaction processingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 2, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 24, 2015IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2015INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 26, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 29, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 29, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance