Drawing for MOBILEMODULAR

USPTO serial 85962537

MOBILEMODULAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILEMODULAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH S HEINO

JOSEPH S HEINO DAVIS & KUELTHAU SC111 E KILBOURN AVE SUITE 1400MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6613UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic skills training kit for use in training pre-college, college and professionals to teach programmable logic controller functionality, AC drive training functionality, automation training functionality, servo drive training functionality, pneumatics training functionality and safety training functionality, namely, a grouping of electronic operator training stations consisting primarily of programmable logic controllers comprising input modules, central processing units, output modules, and programming devices for the operation of controllers, motors, drives, automation and safety devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 16, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 2, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 24, 2021ZZAXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU—
May 24, 2021PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 21, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 21, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 11, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2021PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 4, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 27, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 26, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 21, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 30, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 27, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 27, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 25, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance