USPTO serial 85963777
ENDANGERED SPECIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENDANGERED SPECIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel T. Earle
DANIEL T. EARLE SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY, LLP5845 RICHMOND HWY STE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303-1872UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CDs, DVDs and downloadable audio and video recordings featuring animated cartoon motion picture films and animated cartoon television programs featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull; video game software and computer game software featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Posters; graphic art prints; framed pictures and paintings; unframed pictures and paintings; printed publications, namely, children's books, comic books and comic strips; all of the aforesaid goods featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, modeled plastic toy figurines, dolls, doll accessories and stand alone video game machines, all featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring youth and children's animated cartoons featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull, provided through radio broadcasts and cable television; entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring animated cartoons featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull, provided through cable television and the Internet; production of radio and television programs and motion picture animated films featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull; providing educational and entertainment services by means of an online website and online computer database, namely, providing on-line computer games about cartoons and children's activities featuring a bunny, a squirrel and a gull | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bunny, Squirrel and Gull Productions Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ENDANGERED SPECIES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |