Drawing for GRC INSIGHTS

USPTO serial 85963922

GRC INSIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRC INSIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patchen M. Haggerty

Patchen M. Haggerty Perkins Coie LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software to enable the creation, integration, review, indexing, searching and reporting of data related to ethics and compliance workplace mattersACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for the creation, integration, review, indexing, searching and reporting of data related to ethics and compliance workplace mattersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 15, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 12, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 28, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 4, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 4, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance