Drawing for SEARS MEMBER ASSIST TEAM

USPTO serial 85964416

SEARS MEMBER ASSIST TEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEARS MEMBER ASSIST TEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Guy W. Barcelona Jr.

RONALD A DICERBO MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON34TH FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60661-4584

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail department store servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 14, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 13, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance