Drawing for ENGINEERED TO PERFORM. BUILT TO LAST.

USPTO serial 85964505

ENGINEERED TO PERFORM. BUILT TO LAST.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGINEERED TO PERFORM. BUILT TO LAST.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elise Tenen-Aoki

MICHAEL E HALL KACVINSKY DAISAK BLUNI PLLC101 CARNEGIE CENTER, SUITE 106PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Trailer-mounted and skid-mounted diesel generators for use in the mining industry, oil and gas industry, and other industrial applicationsACTIVE—
009Prefabricated modular buildings and e-houses sold as a housing component of custom-designed, medium- and low-voltage electrical equipment for use in the mining industry, oil and gas industry, and other industrial applications for electrical distribution, protection, and control; portable low-to-medium voltage electric power centers for power distribution, monitoring and controlling for use in the mining industry, oil and gas industry, and other industrial applications; skid mounted and aboveground and underground electric substations, namely, skid mounted aboveground and underground portable low-to-medium voltage electric power centers for monitoring and controlling mining operations consisting of medium voltage switch or breaker, low-to-medium voltage transformer, electronic motor control centers, namely, control consoles and programmable logic controllers, power take-off and automation panels for monitoring, diagnosing problems and controlling the distribution and flow of electrical power, featuring motor protection relays, ground fault relays, arc flash relays, feeder protection relays, custom key pads, variable frequency drives; portable power cable couplers for use in underground and aboveground mining; electronic controls for motors and custom-built switchgear for use in the mining industry, oil and gas industry, and other industrial applications; electric generator controls and electrical equipment consisting of neutral grounding resistor and electric monitoring relays for use in the mining industry, oil and gas industry, and other industrial applications; electric relays, namely, motor protection relays, ground fault relays, arc flash relays, feeder protection relays, pump protection relays, timers, flashers, power and voltage monitors, pump controllers, liquid level and load sensors, and current transformers, all for use in the mining industry, oil and gas industry, and other industrial applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 21, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 21, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 1, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 26, 2015RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
May 21, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 21, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 21, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 20, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 20, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 27, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2014RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Oct 17, 2014RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2014RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Sep 26, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 23, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance