USPTO serial 85964897
ECOCHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOCHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig G. Cochenour
CRAIG G COCHENOUR BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC301 GRANT STFL 20PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1410Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymer chemicals for use in soil erosion control and prevention, moisture control, and hydroseed stabilization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |