USPTO serial 85965095
IMPROVING PATIENT CARE. TOGETHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMPROVING PATIENT CARE. TOGETHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly / Jessica Hiney
TIMOTHY J. KELLY / JESSICA HINEY FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal shelving accessories, namely, metal shelf supports, parts and accessories therefor, namely, metal brackets, metal hooks and metal post to post connectors, metal shelf support posts, metal shelf post clamps; metal post leveling feet, namely, bolts; goods made of metal, namely, shelf joining clamps, shelf wall mounts, coat hanger tubes and brackets; metal shelf dividers, namely, metal partitions for shelves, metal shelf slides, metal casters; wire baskets, namely, baskets made of wire; tilt-out metal bins; metal key locks; metal roll-up doors; changeable drawer pull inserts made of common metal; metal ball bearing slides; metal handles and drawer dividers, namely, partitions and dolly casters, all for shelves | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2009 |
| 009 | Mobile computer workstations comprised of a computer monitor, computer processors, and software used to record, access, track, store and dispense medications, patient care data, medical billing, and medical data | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2009 |
| 012 | medical carts, namely, hospital carts; carts for storing and organizing medical or pharmaceutical supplies; utility carts; service carts; flat carts; specialty carts; lab carts; dollies; rolling carts; and housekeeping carts; wheeled cabinets with drawer units made to hold and transport medical or hospital supplies | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2009 |
| 020 | Metal and polymer shelves; shelves; non-metal shelves; shelving systems consisting of non-metal shelves and supports, enclosure panels, racks, clothes hanger rails, non-metal bins and plastic boxes, posts, connectors, post-to-post connectors, support bars, support poles, storage baskets, wire baskets, shelf and drawer dividers, shelf inlays, utility baskets, hooks, utility hooks, casters, foot plates, leveling feet and supports therefor, wall hangers, floor protector caps, clothes hanger tubes, shelf collar plugs, and metal shelf brackets all sold as a unit with shelving; and, metal cabinets | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERMETRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Metro Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Metro Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named IMPROVING PATIENT CARE. TOGETHER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |