USPTO serial 85965774
THE PERFECT FINISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PERFECT FINISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen Durell
KAREN DURELL MILLER THOMSON LLP40 KING STREET WESTSUITE 5800TORONTO, M5H3S1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vehicle seat covers; Vehicle head rest covers; Arm rest covers; Vehicle door inserts covers; Vehicle map pocket covers | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2013 |
| 017 | Plastic sheeting for containment purposes in the field of environmental protection, namely, for lining canals, sewage lagoons, tanks, landfill sites, mine tailing ponds; heat reflective plastic films to be applied to roofs | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2013 |
| 019 | Non-metal shingles; roofing membranes | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2013 |
| 022 | Protective liners of vinyl for hot tubs, swimming pools, ponds, spas and industrial tanks; protective unfitted liners of flexible vinyl for hot tubs, swimming pools, ponds, spas and industrial tanks | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2013 |
| 024 | Sunblind curtains for use in land vehicles, namely, vinyl curtains; knitted fabric coated in whole or substantial part with silk or soybean protein for use as a cover stock for vehicle seats, vehicle door panels and vehicle instrument panels; flexible vinyl textiles for use in the manufacture of swimming pool liners | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN GENERAL-TOWER LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN GENERAL-TOWER LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named THE PERFECT FINISH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |