Drawing for MAGNIFICENT STUFF

USPTO serial 85966698

MAGNIFICENT STUFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGNIFICENT STUFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant H. Peters

Grant H. Peters Barnes & Thornburg LLPPO Box 2786Chicago, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting business of others in Illinois and promoting tourism in Illinois; public relations; promoting competitions and events of others for promoting tourism and business in IllinoisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 24, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 25, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Oct 1, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance