CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for STRAIGHTSHOT

USPTO serial 85966970

STRAIGHTSHOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRAIGHTSHOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shirley Kopecky

SHIRLEY KOPECKY SHIRLEY KOPECKY, ATTORNEY AT LAW6509 TELUCO ST., SUITE 100HOUSTON, TX 77055UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Non-metal flexible pipesACTIVE—
019Non-metal rigid pipes and non-metal pipe fittingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 14, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 14, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2013MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance