USPTO serial 85967066
MOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Stewart-Mekdara
JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management; Commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others; Retail convenience stores; Retail store services featuring multimedia products, computer, audio visual, telephones, music and photography, printed matter, stationery products, books, products for artistic activities and cultural, games and toys, gymnastic and sporting articles not clothing, maintenance products, Grain, and agricultural, horticultural, and forestry products, gardening and outdoor activities, linens, hardware products, tools, products for cars and cycles, luggage, food products and beverages, alcoholic beverages, liqueur, malt, tobacco products, sanitary preparations, plaster, material for dressing, brush making material, personal care products, health and beauty products, perfumery, oral care products, hair care products, fresh meat, fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, frozen food, seasoning, edible oil and fat, articles of child care not clothing, pharmacy, jewelry, horological instruments, live animal, food stuff for animal and animal products; Supermarkets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |