USPTO serial 85968026
ZIPPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4615966Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2014
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan A. McGonigle
RYAN A MCGONIGLE HODGSON RUSS LLP605 3RD AVENUE SUITE 2300NEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Neckerchiefs, cloth bibs, dressing gowns and rigid bibs as known as plastic baby bibs, suspenders, gloves, underwear, pajamas, socks; clothing, namely, tops and bottoms, and footwear; headgear for babies, namely, hats and caps | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | retail store and wholesale distributorship services and online retail store and wholesale distributorship services, as well as mail order services featuring clothing, footwear, articles for gymnastics and sports, toys, games, toiletries, furniture, textile products, baby bottles, baby bottle tongs, pacifiers, pacifier chains, teething rings, nasal aspirators, thermometers for medical use and teats, children's safety seats and chairs for cars, strollers, reclining chairs, beds, mattresses, playpens, walkers, gift baskets containing products for personal hygiene and clothes' hangers not made of metal for babies and children | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fashion Division, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Fashion Division, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Fashion Division, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ZIPPY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2021 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2014 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |