USPTO serial 85968143
HANSCOMB CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HANSCOMB CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Jay Spiegel
H JAY SPIEGEL H JAY SPIEGEL & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 11MOUNT VERNON, VA 22121-0011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation, particularly in the fields of estimating contract work, business and economic feasibility studies and data analysis/dissemination, cost analyses, project risk management, negotiation and settlement of commercial transactions for third parties, scheduling services, cost assessment services; project management services for others for business purposes in the fields of architecture, engineering interior design and urban planning design | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |