USPTO serial 85968232
GITLAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4594617Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2014
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GITLAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curt Handley
CURT HANDLEY LAW OFFICE OF CURT HANDLEY19540 BUCKINGHAM DR STE 1MOKENA, IL 60448-2432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for collaboratively brainstorming, developing, managing, planning, coordinating, modifying, tracking, testing, reviewing, publishing and archiving digital computer programs, documentation, technical, documents, contracts, sprints, stories, bugs and issues | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1990 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an on-line web site for others for collaboratively brainstorming, developing, managing, planning, coordinating, modifying, tracking, testing, reviewing, publishing and archiving digital computer programs, documentation, technical, documents, contracts, sprints, stories, bugs and issues; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; IT consulting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2021 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 24, 2016 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2016 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| May 3, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |