USPTO serial 85968753
OT FORMULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OT FORMULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Stewart-Mekdara
DANA STEWART-MEKDARA GLOBAL TRADEMARKS, INC.505 S VILLA REAL DRIVE STE 102ANAHEIM, CA 92807-3432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Abrasive cloth; Abrasive paper; Breath freshening sprays; Cleaning preparations; Dental bleaching gels; Dentifrices; Floor wax removers; Laundry bleach; Non-medicated mouthwashes; Polishing preparations; Preparation for cleaning dentures; Scouring solutions; Soaps for household use; Toothpaste; and Washing preparations and laundry bleach | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Basins; Beverage glassware; Bottle openers; Bowls; Brushes for footwear; Busts of earthenware or porcelain; Cake molds; Carpet beaters; Cattle hair for brushes; Chocolate molds; Cleaning brushes for household use; Cleaning rags; Cloth for washing floors; Clothes pegs; Clothes racks, for drying; Coffee pots; Combs; Confectioners' molds; Containers for household or kitchen use; Cookery molds; Cooking pots; Cupcake molds; Cutting boards; Dental floss; Dishwashing brushes; Disposable table plates; Drying racks for washing; Dustbins; Earthenware basins; Earthenware mugs; Electric toothbrushes; Flasks; Flat-iron stands; Frying pans; Furniture dusters; Glass bowls; Grass sprinklers; Grills in the nature of cooking utensils; Hand-operated grinders; Household utensils, namely, graters; Household utensils, namely, sieves; Household utensils, namely, strainers; Household utensils, namely, table plates, tableware other than knives, forks and spoons, namely, serving spoons, serving forks; hand-operated mills for domestic purposes, namely, salt and pepper mills; cake molds; Ice cube molds; Ice pails; Industrial packaging containers of glass or porcelain; Japanese style earthenware mortars (suribachi); Jars for jams and jellies of porcelain; Kettles; Lawn sprinklers; Mixing spoons; Mops; Non-electric food blenders; Ornaments of porcelain; Pads of metal for cleaning; Pails; Pastry molds; Pepper mills; Pig bristles; Plastic molds for household use in making soap; Plungers for clearing blocked drains; Porcelain cake decorations; Porcelain flower pots; Porcelain mugs; Pudding molds; Raccoon dog hair for brushes; Salt mills; Saucers; Scrubbing brushes; Shaving brushes; Sponges for household purposes; Sprinklers for watering flowers and plants; Steel wool for cleaning; Strainers for household purposes; Tea pots; Toilet brushes; Toothbrush cases; Toothbrushes; Toothpicks; Unworked or semi-worked glass; Works of art of earthenware or porcelain | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blissful Centany International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Blissful Centany International Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named OT FORMULA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |