USPTO serial 85969866
DISCOVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4841783Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 2015
- Examiner
- CARLSEN, EMILY K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DISCOVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason S. Howell
JASON S. HOWELL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Electronic discovery staffing services; database management; personnel management and related consulting in the field of electronic discovery and legal document review; employment staffing and related consulting in the field of legal document review; business records management; business information management; business information management consulting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2013 |
| 042 | Computer software, platform and database consulting, design, installation, and deployment; computer forensic and investigation services; data hosting services; computer security consulting; computer services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software for management of electronic discovery, electronic document review, search and analysis of data, and electronic records retention for litigation and electronic legal discovery purposes; electronic storage of documents and consulting related thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2013 |
| 045 | Litigation support services; Litigation support services, namely, conducting electronic legal discovery in the nature of review of electronically stored information and data; litigation consulting services; legal document review and consulting related thereto; legal services, namely, litigation consulting; consulting in the field of database security, protection and breach response services; legal services, namely, electronic discovery services utilizing predictive analytics; electronic legal discovery services, namely, consulting regarding search and retrieval of electronically stored data that could be relevant in a lawsuit, legal proceeding or investigation; electronic legal discovery services utilizing statistical sampling; electronic legal discovery, namely, on-premise and remote data collection; electronic legal discovery, namely, collection, compilation, review and analysis of data, and document and data production services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liffey Thames Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Liffey Thames Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Liffey Thames Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DISCOVIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |