USPTO serial 85971887
VINNIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4995671Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2016
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VINNIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
West Yorkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
West Yorkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
West Yorkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
WAKEFIELD, WEST YORKSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra MacKay
ALEXANDRA MACKAY STITES & HARBISON, PLLC401 COMMERCE ST STE 800NASHVILLE, TN 37219-2490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | snack foods, namely, animal fat-based snack foods, bean-based snack foods, fruit-based snack foods, nut-based snack foods, potato-based snack foods, snack food dips, soy-based snack foods, vegetable-based snack foods; processed nuts, potato crisps; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; milk beverages with high milk content; yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | biscuits; grain-based snack foods; cereal-based snack food, corn-based snack foods, multigrain-based snack foods, quinoa-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods; dairy products being ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Northern Foods Grocery Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by FOX'S BISCUITS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VINNIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| May 23, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |