USPTO serial 85972363
STREETSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STREETSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
JAMES R MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for advertising, marketing and promoting the products and services of others, for creating and managing to-do lists, task lists and reminders, for distributing discounts, gifts, rebates, vouchers and premiums to consumers, for collecting, organizing and providing feedback from consumers, for providing recommendations and referrals related to the products and services of others and related to products, services, events, activities, attractions and facilities in particular geographic locations, and for publishing and providing user-generated guides and recommendations of local or nearby businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others via the operation of a loyalty program where users of an online community can shop at participating online and brick and mortar businesses and benefit from discounts, gifts, rebates, vouchers and premiums; Promoting the goods and services of others via the operation of a website featuring coupons, discounts, gifts, rebates, vouchers, premiums, price-comparison information, referrals, product reviews, links to the websites of others and discount information; Advertising the wares and services of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of a web-based software application that allows third-party businesses to advertise, market and promote products and services to a community of users of said applications based on information posted by said users within the application; managing mobile application software that allows third-party businesses to advertise, market and promote products and services to a community of users of said applications based on information posted by said users within the application; providing temporary use of a web-based software application for creating and managing to-do lists, task lists and reminders; managing mobile application software for creating and managing to-do lists, task lists and reminders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |