Drawing for ULTIMATE VALUE

USPTO serial 85974575

ULTIMATE VALUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTIMATE VALUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean R. Karau

DEAN R KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH STSTE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, knit tops, hosiery and tights; clothing accessories, namely, fabric belts, belts made of leatherACTIVEMar 1, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 9, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2015CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
May 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 11, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 11, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 9, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 9, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2014CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 1, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 3, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 3, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 14, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance