Drawing for MULTIACCOUNT

USPTO serial 85975016

MULTIACCOUNT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTIACCOUNT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Gantt

DANIEL M GANTT DYNAMICS INC493 NIXON ROADCHESWICK, PA 15024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cards with integrated circuits; Chipcards; Electronic circuit cards; Encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to progress a financial transaction; Encoded electronic chip cards for progressing a financial transaction; Encoded integrated circuit cards containing programming used to progress a financial transaction; Encoded magnetic cards; Encoded smart cards containing programming used to progress a financial transaction; Integrated circuit cards and components; Magnetic cards; Magnetic coded cards for progressing a financial transaction; Magnetically encoded credit cards; Microchip cardsACTIVEJun 8, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 30, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 24, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 16, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 16, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 16, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 8, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 28, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2010ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 29, 2010UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2010INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Sep 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance