USPTO serial 85975016
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gantt
DANIEL M GANTT DYNAMICS INC493 NIXON ROADCHESWICK, PA 15024UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cards with integrated circuits; Chipcards; Electronic circuit cards; Encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to progress a financial transaction; Encoded electronic chip cards for progressing a financial transaction; Encoded integrated circuit cards containing programming used to progress a financial transaction; Encoded magnetic cards; Encoded smart cards containing programming used to progress a financial transaction; Integrated circuit cards and components; Magnetic cards; Magnetic coded cards for progressing a financial transaction; Magnetically encoded credit cards; Microchip cards | ACTIVE | Jun 8, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |