Drawing for DUMBDUMB

USPTO serial 85975055

DUMBDUMB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUMBDUMB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DR FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING COMEDY, DRAMA, ACTION, ADVENTURE AND/OR ANIMATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 24, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 24, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 23, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 23, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 22, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 22, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2011AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2011IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2011AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 4, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 3, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 30, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 14, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 7, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance