USPTO serial 85975582
INTEGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2011
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Asheville, NC
Asheville, NC
Chapel Hill, NC
Chapel Hill, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
JAMES M. BAGARAZZI DORITY & MANNING, P.A.PO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Torrefied biomass, namely, a lignocellulosic material used as a fuel for generating electricity, heat and energy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRO EARTH FUELS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named INTEGRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 4, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |