Drawing for LOUISVILLE SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 85975755

LOUISVILLE SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LOUISVILLE SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle Anne Citrynell

KYLE ANNE CITRYNELL SEILLER WATERMAN LLC462 S 4TH ST FL 22LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3466UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training services in the fields of information technology, chemical engineering, corrosion engineering, electrical engineering, computer engineering, marine technology and engineering and fleet maintenance, business management. quality improvement systems. structural corrosion detection, prevention and structural maintenance to minimize corrosion and improve surface and structure maintenance, and educational services, namely, providing (classes, seminars, and workshops) in the fields of information technology, chemical engineering, corrosion engineering, electrical engineering, computer engineering, marine technology and engineering and fleet maintenance, business management, quality improvement systems, structural corrosion detection. prevention and structural maintenance to minimize corrosion and improve surface and structure maintenanceACTIVE—
042Testing and evaluation services in the fields of information technology chemical engineering, corrosion engineering, electrical engineering, computer engineering. marine technology and engineering and fleet maintenance, business management, quality improvement systems, structural corrosion detection, prevention and structural maintenance to minimize corrosion and improve surface and structure maintenance: research and development in the fields of corrosion engineering, structural corrosion detection. prevention and structural maintenance, and related to devices for the detection, measurement, and minimization of surface and structural corrosionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 2, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance