USPTO serial 85976047
THIS OR THAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THIS OR THAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N. Makous
DAVID N. MAKOUS LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2663UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND PROMOTING THE SALE AND SERVICING OF AUTOMOBILES THROUGH AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS BY DISSEMINATION OF PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED MATERIAL, AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES, TELEVISION AND RADIO BROADCASTS, THROUGH AN ONLINE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND THROUGH WEBSITES AND PROMOTIONAL CONTESTS; AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP SERVICES; ADVERTISING, MARKETING AND PROMOTING THE SERVICING OF AUTOMOBILES AND RELATED WARRANTY PROGRAMS; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOBILES FOR SALE, AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, AUTOMOBILE PRODUCTS FOR SALE, AND AUTOMOBILE PROMOTIONS | ACTIVE | May 26, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |