USPTO serial 85976240
INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4338895Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2013
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Board of Control for Cricket in India
Mumbai, IN
Other trademarks owned by The Board of Control for Cricket in India
The Board of Control for Cricket in India
Mumbai, IN
Other trademarks owned by The Board of Control for Cricket in India
The Board of Control for Cricket in India
Mumbai, IN
Other trademarks owned by The Board of Control for Cricket in India
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ajit Vaidya
AJIT VAIDYA KENEALY VAIDYA LLP515 E BRADDOCK RDALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2161UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Multi-purpose cloth bags, mesh bags for storage of cricket equipment; awnings, tents, tarpaulins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral water; aerated water; effervescent drinking water and carbonated water; drinking water; processed drinking water; spring water; flavored water; fruit-flavored and fruit-based beverages; fruit and vegetable juices; ginger ale, soft drinks, sodas and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; sports drinks; energy drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising, business administration, and business management services for others in the field of cricket and the organization and administration of cricket; club services, namely, promoting the interests of cricket | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction and refurbishment of cricket stadiums and related consultation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Coordinating transport and travel arrangement for cricket players and teams | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Providing temporary accommodations; providing of food and drink all for cricket players, umpires, referees, administrators, and commentators; bar, café, bistro, pub, coffee shop, tea bar, wine bar, and restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Board of Control for Cricket in India
- Other trademarks owned by The Board of Control for Cricket in India
- Other trademarks owned by The Board of Control for Cricket in India
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 21, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | RPUB | NOA CANCELLED; REPUBLICATION REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |