USPTO serial 85976523
PRO-SECUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO-SECUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cutler Bay, FL
Cutler Bay, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Lockhart
TIMOTHY J. LOCKHART WILLCOX & SAVAGE P.C.440 MONTICELLO AVE STE 2200Attn.: IP AdministratorNORFOLK, VA 23510-2243Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal safes; chests of metal; steel sheets; armour plating; safety chains of metal; boxes of common metal; safety cashboxes of metal; metal padlocks; locks of metal other than electric; box fasteners of metal; storage tanks of metal; doors of metal; bars for metal railings | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Burglar alarm installation and repair; safe maintenance and repair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |