USPTO serial 85976593
DISPLAYFLIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4155837Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2012
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DISPLAYFLIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Harrisburg, PA
Harrisburg, PA
Harrisburg, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Gold, Esquire
KEVIN M. GOLD, ESQUIRE Pillar+Aught4201 E. Park CircleHARRISBURG, PA 17111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Bearers and support constructions, in the form of metal pipes and metal poles for advertising surfaces; Metal poles, namely, poles for displaying advertising and decorative banners, flags, displays, panels, and the like; metal accessories for metallic display stands for presenting printed and unprinted advertising material, namely, connectors for connecting two or more frames or bases; metallic framework; metallic runners, namely, rails for fixing welt-seamed display materials; metal wall-mounted boards, panels and plates for exhibitions, displays and partitioning | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 9, 2012 |
| 020 | Non-metal poles, namely, poles made of synthetic material for displaying advertising and decorative banners, flags, displays, panels, and the like; Non-metallic display stands for presenting printed and unprinted advertising material, made of plastic, reinforced plastic or wood; accessories for the non-metal poles and display stands for displaying advertising and decorative banners, flags, displays, panels, and the like, namely, clamps, adapters in the nature of springs, hooks and clips, fasteners in the nature of screws and display boards, panels and plates, all made of plastic, reinforced plastic or wood; non-metallic frameworks for display stands for presenting printed and unprinted advertising material made of plastic, reinforced plastic or wood; non-metallic frame strips in the nature of display frames for presenting advertising material; Metallic display stands for presenting printed and unprinted advertising material; metallic framework, namely, metal-based display stand frames for use with interchangeable banners, flags and the like; metallic frame strips, namely, metal-based display frames for presenting advertising material | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 9, 2012 |
| 024 | Single and multi-layered printed and not printed textiles used for advertising purposes, namely, flags, pennants, streamers, banners and cloth flags with different shapes for indoor and outdoor decoration purposes; Single and multi-layered coated and non-coated textile fabrics for presenting advertising material | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 9, 2012 |
| 040 | Printing services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 9, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vispronet, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vispronet, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vispronet, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named DISPLAYFLIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |