USPTO serial 85976640
LION PACKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4234248Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2012
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LION PACKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LEWES, DE
LEWES, DE
LEWES, DE
Sefad, IL
SEFAD, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural grains for planting; unprocessed grains; living animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; agricultural seeds; grass seeds; flower seeds; natural plants; flowers; foodstuffs for animals; malt for brewing and distilling | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 22, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LION PACKS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LION PACKS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LION PACKS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ganor, Yair
- Other trademarks owned by LION PACKS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named LION PACKS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 1, 2014 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |