USPTO serial 85976668
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Ling
Steven Ling JOSEPH WORLDWIDE COUNSELSP.O. Box 7-1023Taipei City, 10699TAIWAN| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic beverages adapted for medical purposes; dietary and nutritionally fortified food products adapted for medical use; dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; medicinal drinks; medicinal herbs; medicines for improving constipation symptoms, helping digestion and losing weight; menstruation bandages; candies for medical purposes; chemical reagents for medical or veterinary purposes; air freshening preparations; deodorants for clothing and textiles; depuratives for the body; cleansing solutions for medical use; enzymes for medical purposes; disinfectants for hygiene purposes; sanitary sterilizing preparations; food for babies; lactose to be used in the manufacture of foodstuffs; whey protein supplements; mineral food supplements; nutritional additives for medical purposes used in foods and dietary supplements for human consumption; dietary supplements consisting of vitamins, minerals, herbs, fiber, or protein in tablet, powder, capsule or liquid form; nutritional fortified protein drink mixes; vitamin supplement in tablet form for use in making an effervescent beverage when added to water; vitamin supplement in powder form for use in making an effervescent beverage when added to water | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bee glue being propolis for human consumption; royal jelly for human consumption, not for medical purposes; honey; molasses; yeast; yeast in pill form, not for medical use; chocolate-based beverages with milk; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages; tea substitutes; farinaceous foods paste for human consumption; glucose for food; groats for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Aerated water; whey beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, nonalcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, non-alcoholic malt beverages, mineral waters, fruit beverages, fruit juices, carbonated and non-carbonated drinking waters, syrups for non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; isotonic beverages; vegetable drinks; syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages; water beverages; Lithia water; mineral water; soda water | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and on-line retail store services featuring cosmetics, hairdressing preparations, cleaning preparations, nutrition replacement supplements, beverages and foods, health supplements, beverages and foods, and therapeutic and physiotherapy preparations, foods and beverages; direct mail advertising; marketing and promotional services; business management and organization consultancy; dissemination of advertising matter via mail order publications; commercial information agencies; business assistance outsourcing services; sales promotion for others; providing commercial information and advice for consumers; import-export agencies; auctioneering; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes; systemization of information into computer databases; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |