USPTO serial 85976677
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Shelton, CT
LAKE FOREST, CA
Aliso Viejo, CA
Shelton, CT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melanie C. Holloway
Melanie C. Holloway McGuireWoods LLP800 East Canal StreetGateway PlazaRichmond, VA 23219-3916| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Tweezers, eyebrow shapers, scissors and eyelash curlers; manicure and pedicure implements, namely, nail clippers, nippers, nail files, foot files, nail smoothers, nail buffers, cuticle scissors, cuticle pushers, cuticle removers, cuticle cleaners, callus reducers, foot files, foot sanding blocks, foot smoothers, foot callus rasps, callus cutters and non-electric callus shavers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2012 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |