USPTO serial 85977071
SWISSTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWISSTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
Theodore R. Remaklus Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Spa and yoga wear, namely, pants, tops, tank tops, bras, shorts, shirts, jackets, sweaters, socks, robes, and headbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GALAXY BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Clarion Medical Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clarion Medical Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SWISSTEC
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |