USPTO serial 85977086
HALO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HALO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glastonbury, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wm. Tucker Griffith
WM TUCKER GRIFFITH MCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STREET CITY PLACE II18TH FLOORHARTFORD, CT 06103-3410Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of applications and data of others via a cloud computing system, excluding applications in the field of geophysical exploration for oil and gas and other minerals and geophysical data gathering services, remote online backup of computer data, and local and remote recovery of computer data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |