USPTO serial 85977892
BEURRE & SEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4322467Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 2013
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEURRE & SEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery goods; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Cookie dough; Cookie mixes; Cookie pies; Cookies; Frozen cookie dough; Mixes for bakery goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 25, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |